Showing posts with label Family Law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Family Law. Show all posts

Monday, June 04, 2012

Dad can sue for unauthorized adoption

Charlotesville Family Law Attorneys

Dad can sue for unauthorized adoption

Google Stock Image

April 23rd, 2012 · No Comments · Supreme Court of Virginia, Uncategorized

A Virginia father can seek damages from adoption lawyers and a Utah couple who adopted his child without his permission, a divided Supreme Court of Virginia said on April 20. A tort claim for “tortious interference with parental rights” is part of Virginia common law, the court said.

According to the father’s complaint, the mother misled him into thinking they would rear the child together, while she continued talking to lawyers about adoption, at the urging of her parents. The mother did not inform plaintiff when she went into labor early and when she delivered the child on Feb. 10, 2009. Although plaintiff John Wyatt III sued for custody in Virginia, Utah courts have awarded custody to the adoptive couple. Wyatt sued in a Virginia federal court, which certified questions to the Virginia high court.

The Virginia Supreme Court authorized Wyatt’s suit against Virginia lawyer Mark McDermott, Utah lawyer Larry Jenkins and the Act of Love agency and adoptive parents Thomas and Chandra Zarembinski.

“It is both astonishing and profoundly disturbing that in this case, a biological mother and her parents, with the aid of two licensed attorneys and an adoption agency, could intentionally act to prevent a biological father — who is in no way alleged to be an unfit parent — from legally establishing his parental rights and gaining custody of a child whom the mother did not want to keep, and that this father would have no recourse in the law,” wrote Justice LeRoy F. Millette Jr. for the court majority.

Justices William C. Mims, S. Bernard Goodwyn and Elizabeth McClanahan found no such common law right and dissented from the decision “legislating public policy in Virginia through judicial pronouncement,” in McClanahan’s words.

The opinion in Wyatt v. McDermott is VLW 012-6-078.

Other cases released April 20 are highlighted in the VLW SCoVA Blog.
– Deborah Elkins

Interesting article.  Please contact us if you need legal advice.

Tucker Griffin Barnes
Charlottesville, VA (434-973-7474)
Inquire@TGBLaw.com

www.TGBLaw.com
www.Facebook.com/TuckerGriffinBarnes

Thursday, May 31, 2012

What should an attorney do when they notice their client has diminished capacity?

This article was written as advice to attorneys who notice their client has diminished capacity.  Although written for attorneys, we think it provides excellent insight into the problems many families are facing today.

When you notice your client has diminished capacity

By Virginia Lawyers Weekly
Published: May 17, 2012
Tags:
 
At some point in your practice you may be confronted by the diminished capacity of a client. With the American population aging, the number of individuals with diminished capacity is increasing. An attorney may be faced with a client in crisis because of diminished capacity and possibly challenged by one of the following scenarios:


Scenario 1

You have done the estate planning of a couple a few years ago, and then the wife comes to see you. She is concerned because her husband, who is suffering from dementia, has a new behavior of uncontrollable spending. The husband is continuously giving money or writing checks to whoever comes to their front door. The couple had executed a standard estate plan including last wills and testaments, healthcare powers of attorney, durable financial powers of attorney and revocable trusts. Now these documents may not be sufficient enough to protect the couple. In addition, you are faced with a conflict of interest since only the wife is coming to see you while you began the relationship as joint representation.

Scenario 2

The children of your client come to see you for a consultation, because they are concerned that their mom is being financially exploited by her housekeeper. Mom recently revoked the power of attorney designating the children as agents, and has signed a new power of attorney designating the housekeeper. What shall you do?
In both scenarios we are faced with a potential conflict of interest. In both, however, we can see the need to protect the client.

One possible solution in scenario 1 would be to have a meeting with both the wife and the husband to address the issues. This will give you an opportunity to assess whether the husband is capable of and willing to cooperate in taking steps to protect the couples’ assets. If all of the assets were titled in the revocable trust you will be able to recommend that the husband resign as trustee. In addition, you may wish to confirm there are no other assets outside of the trust that could fall under the control of a new agent, should the husband revoke the current power of attorney and create a new one. If these measures are not sufficient, the wife could petition for guardianship and conservatorship of her husband. However, since you also have a client-attorney relationship with the husband, you cannot represent the wife in this matter. This petition will require a doctor’s evaluation and opinion that the husband is not capable of making decisions about his personal and financial affairs. It will certainly be easy for the wife to contact the doctor because the husband should have signed a HIPAA release on her behalf.

For the second scenario (action of the children), it may be necessary to pursue a petition for guardianship and conservatorship of the mother, with an express provision to revoke the existing power of attorney.

Again, you have an existing attorney-client relationship with the mother, and representing the children would conflict with that relationship. However, if you determine that the circumstances meet the requirements of Rule 1.14 of the Rules of Professional Responsibility, you can be the petitioner in seeking the appointment of a guardian and conservator to protect your client. Unless the children have a release from mom, collecting a doctor’s evaluation report will be more difficult in this case. It is not certain that the mom has executed a HIPAA release and/or the children may not have access to their mother’s doctor. The best solution would be for the children to become more involved in their mother’s healthcare. They will need to accompany their mother to her doctor’s appointment and to try to have her execute a HIPAA release. The children will have to outline their concerns with their mother’s doctor and ask that the doctor conduct an evaluation. If this is not possible, a petition for guardianship can be filed together with a motion for the court to order a doctor’s evaluation. In addition, the court-appointed guardian ad litem has the authority to require an evaluation as part of the investigation of the allegations of the petitioner’s complaint.

Another option in both scenarios is to contact Adult Protective Services, and present the concerns about safety and financial exploitation. Adult Protective Services will do an inquiry provided that they are permitted in the home when they knock at the front door. Their investigation may take time and you may want immediate action.

As the attorney of a client with diminished capacity you also have a special duty to protect your client. Rule 1.14 (b) provides that an attorney should “take reasonably necessary protective action” when a client “is at risk of substantial physical, financial or other harm.” The American Bar Association suggests that the attorney may take action on behalf of a client under the following circumstances:

•?It is an emergency situation that threats the health, safety or financial interest of the person under disability;
•?Action is required only to the extent necessary to maintain the statusquo or otherwise avoid immediate or irreparable harm; and
•?Only confidential information necessary to achieve the intended action shall be disclosed by the attorney.

Although it seems that the attorney can make decisions in a proceeding on behalf of an impaired client, under no circumstance can an attorney perform any act, or make any decision, which the law requires the client to perform or make, if the client is legally incompetent.

From a legal stand point, incapacity is officially determined by the court. Otherwise there is a presumption of capacity. However, the practitioner will always have to assess whether the client has the capacity to enter into a contract of representation, and whether the client has the capacity to execute a legal document.

Even if the capacity is presumed, the practitioner must determine whether or not a prospective client has sufficient legal capacity to enter into a contract for the lawyer’s services. Then, the lawyer will have to evaluate the client’s legal capacity to carry out the specific legal transactions desired as part of the representation.

The failure to assess a client’s capacity has been asserted as grounds for legal malpractice by would-be beneficiaries of a client. The standards of practice continue to evolve as the prevalence of incapacity rises and as a greater awareness of the need to address capacity issues has emerged. Legal malpractice for failure to address capacity questions in cases is no longer a remote possibility, and with Rule 1.14 (b) attorneys are also required to take steps to protect their clients.

- By Yahne Piorini, who practices elder law with Miorini Law PLLC in McLean.

Excellent article.  Please let us know if you need legal advice.


Tucker Griffin Barnes
Charlottesville, VA (434-973-7474)
Lake Monticello (434-589-3636)
Inquire@TGBLaw.com


www.TGBLaw.com
Facebook
Pinterest Gallery

 

Thursday, May 14, 2009

Advanced Family Law Training


Charlottesville family law attorney, Laura B. Butler, recently completed two advanced family law seminars: (1) Legislative Insights, and Divorce in a Bad Economy and (2) Untying The Know: Everything You Wanted to Know (and more) About the Military and divorce. Important topics to her clients included advising divorce clients in tough financial times, interplay between divorce and bankruptcy, the servicemember's Civil Relief Act and the Uniformed Services Former Spouse Protection Act.


Laura B. Butler (firm partner)
Charlottesville Divorce Attorney
Tucker Griffin Barnes P.C.
Charlottesville, Virginia
434-973-7474
LButler@TGBlaw.com
http://www.tgblaw.com/